Introduction to Inclusive Assessments using Universal Design for Learning
The key to making your assessments more inclusive using Universal Design for Learning is flexibility, transparency, and choice. When designing assessments, consider whether any student would be, or feel, excluded either by the subject content, the assessment methodology or schedule, or whether any student would need alternative arrangements to be made.
Watch this short video by CAST which introduces assessment when viewed from a UDL lens. [3:09 minutes]
Assessments are designed to measure knowledge, skills, and abilities. Constructs are the knowledge, skills or abilities being measured by an assessment.
By their nature, however, most assessments include features that are not relevant to the construct being assessed. Often the methods and materials used in assessments require additional skills and understanding. These are considered to be construct irrelevant.
Construct-irrelevant features of assessments may pose barriers for some students, preventing an accurate measurement of the construct.
What are some examples of construct irrelevance, and what barriers do they pose for our students?
Example of Construct Relevance
Sean sets a timed, closed-book essay exam for his History students. This type of assessment includes the following construct-irrelevant factors:
- motor coordination (handwriting or typing skills)
- short-term and working memory
- organization
- time management
- attention
- the ability to work under pressure
This does not accurately measure his students' knowledge of History
Visit UDL on Campus for more information on UDL and Assessments
How do I start to make my assessments more inclusive?
Idea | Tips |
---|---|
Meaningful assessment |
|
Choice and flexibility |
|
Provide scaffolding and support |
|
Transparency and expectations |
|
Constructive and encouraging feedback: |
|
Key questions for inclusive assessments
When implementing Universal Design for Learning into your assessments, consider the following questions:
- Do your assessments align with the module learning outcomes?
- How can you add student choice to your assessments?
- Will students have choice over how they submit, at least some, assignments?
- What technologies might you use for assessment?
- Are there ways you can work with your students to co-construct the module assessments or rubrics together?
- Can you break a large assignment into smaller chunks over the semester?
- What sorts of real-world scenarios lend themselves to your assessments?
- How will you support student learning? How will you give students the opportunity to practice the skills they need for each assessment? Will you offer no-consequences practice to allow your students to test their learning without grades?
- How will you check with your learners for their understanding?
- How and when will you grade your students? How will they know they are succeeding in the module?
- How will you give formative and summative feedback?
- Will students be able to resubmit based on this feedback?
- How will you include peer assessment and peer feedback?
- How will students be able to reflect on their learning?
-
Allow students to choose if they work individually or in a group.
-
Ensure each group member has clear roles and responsibilities and an even workload. Ask groups to create guidelines for their group to adhere to.
-
Ensure diversity in groups
-
When grading, allow a group and individual mark
-
Ask students to reflect on the group work, and their own roles in a learning journal.
-
Allow students to submit drafts of essays, or an essay plan, and to revise based on your feedback
-
Give students resources on how to write essays. Link them to the Regional Writing Centre.
-
Provide sample essays
-
Provide rubrics to allow students to understand what you are looking for
-
Allow students to pre-record their presentations if they have anxiety about speaking in public, or allow them to present in different formats
-
Offer support and resources on presentation skills
-
Use for shorter formative assessments, not for summative assessments with a large grade weighting.
-
Allow extra time for students
-
Use a variety of question types
-
Allow students to use different types of responses to questions (multiple choice, short answers, drag and drop etc)
-
Allow students to choose questions to respond to (e.g. choose 15 of 20 questions)
-
Allow students to go back and change answers if needed before they submit
-
Avoid negative marking
-
Use an accessible format for text to speech software
-
Provide past papers for students to see the exam format
-
Let students practice exams
-
Provide resources on how to succeed in exams
-
Give clear expectations on what to expect, and what is expected of them
-
Allow extra time
-
Allow students to choose from a variety of topics to answer
-
Allow students to respond in a variety of ways (written, drawing a chart or diagram etc)
-
Reconsider the 100% end-of-semester exam and provide formative assessments also.
-
Rethinking Assessment - Alternative assessments to end of term exams (PDF - 5 minute read): A resource created during the pandemic on alternatives to end of semester exams, with supported online tools.
-
Reimagining assessment: Website which provides resources around three critical elements of assessment: workload, groups, and feedback. Output from a Community of Practice.
-
E-tivities as Assessments: Video by Dr Darina Slattery with advice on creating e-tivities for students as assessment (Video: 35 minutes)
- UDL and Assessment CASTS's UDL on Campus assessment resources
- Top 10 UDL Tips for Assessment CAST's tips on how to use the UDL framework to design and reflect on assessments. (PDF, 7 minute read)
- A Practitioner’s Guide to Choice of Assessment Methods within a Module Resource produced by UCD's Dr Geraldine O'Neill concerning how to offer choice of assessment while maintaining fairness and academic integrity.le means of action and expression. (PDF, longer read with case studies)
-
10 Ways to Ensure Online Assessment is Accessible and Inclusive Guidance document by AHEAD. It is essential to ensure that any new assessment and feedback approaches that you introduce consider the needs of all students. Outlines how you can can ensure, as far as possible, that the online assessments you plan are accessible to and inclusive of all your students. (Website, 4 minute read)
-
The National Forum Insight: Expanding our Understanding of Assessment and Feedback in Irish Higher Education National Forum Insight aims to expand our understanding of the terms associated with assessment within the Irish higher education sector. (PDF, 7 minute read)
-
Feedback Opportunities in Online Learning by Surrey Assessment and Learning Lab - outlines benefits of, and recommendations for using, various digitally enabled approaches to feedback. (PDF, 3 minute read)
-
Authentic Assessment in Irish Higher Education This insight summarises the outcomes of a National Forum workshop on authentic assessment. It explains the rationale for authentic assessment and presents some characteristics of this assessment approach. (PDF, 5 minute read)
-
Enhancing Programme Approaches to Assessment and Feedback in Irish Higher Education: Case Studies, Commentaries and Tools This resource aims to assist staff and students in exploring approaches that consider assessment and feedback from a programme view. Contains case studies, commentaries and tools supporting the enhancement of assessment and feedback in Irish higher education programmes (PDF, longer read with case studies)
-
How to Universally Design Grading by Novak Education. A UDL Grading Flowchart to help guide you through your UDL grading process.